I believe that Lightroom (and Photoshop and Bridge) should allow me to find out what the exif shutter count is, and not give a misleading number of "photos taken with this camera" that appears as if it comes from exif. So, there is no relationship between the number of "photos taken with this camera" and the exif shutter count. Also, some of the photos I have taken with this camera have never been imported into LR, or were imported into a different catalog. psd, edit.tif, etc.) derived from the same original image. So maybe yours was a display model at the most. Shutter count is one of those EXIF fields that are in a different place and format for each manufacturer, and LR tends not to show fields of that type. The arrow to the right of Lens shows all the images taken by that lens, for instance. In my catalog, I occasionally have more than one file (.nef. even the brand new ones come with more than one shutter count - apparently during the testing phase for QC. It works like most of the other arrows in the Metadata panel. The number is actually the number of photos in the catalog that were taken with the camera in question. the EXIF annotation, storing information on the image such as shutter speed. Looking at EXIF metadata (I'm looking from the Library module) there is nothing that says "Shutter Count." There is an arrow next to Serial Number, and hovering over the arrow gives me the helpful information "Photos taken with this camera." If I click on the arrow, I get much good information, but the photos taken with this camera is not the shutter count it is not derived from the metadata created by the camera and I do not believe that it is actually EXIF metadata. Exchangeable Image File Format (EXIF) defines information related to the photo, like the exposure settings, date and time. information in digital photography image files using JPEG compression. When I try to find this through LR metadata, I not only don't find it, but I find misleading information. xmp files written by LR, there is a keyword, "Shutter Count." At least that's what exiftool and Opanda Exif tell me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |